User talk:CleavedCognition

Welcome
The wiki's sort of a mess right now. Thanks for the work you're doing. Diotic (t 21:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Grouped pages
Is there really a need for pages that just group things together? Each biome should have an individual page for details, and there's a biome page for basics. There's not much info to be had about props--name, biome(s), price (usually 250), does it blow up? (usually yes), is it discoverable? (usually yes)--and I thought that could be contained between the props page and individual biome articles.

I'm not trying to discourage you from working on the wiki, just questioning the purpose for a page based on a particular theme when it could easily be a subsection of a larger article. Diotic (t

I made the Bones (prop type) page to help illustrate the different props in that category. I felt it was a nice way to give that information in one place. I can see some merit in going about it the other way- as in, having the props of a certain biome be listed in the biome page, so I might actually get on doing that. If you feel having a page for each prop type specifically is going to clutter the wiki too much, I'd be happy to remove the page. It just seemed a bit un-wiki-like to have the prop types be listed as plain text. CleavedCognition (t


 * It's not that individual prop pages would clutter the wiki. I just don't think there's enough about them to warrant a whole article, or an outstanding cause for splitting group articles up into types and themes. They should be merged, but the problem is that we haven't really made the content they should be merged with yet. Diotic (t 17:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)